WASHINGTON (AP) — As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to finalize his Cabinet, the selection of a treasury secretary is poised to provide critical insights into his administration’s stance on tariffs and trade policy. The candidates under consideration reflect a range of perspectives on how Trump might implement the protectionist measures that characterized his campaign.
Leading contenders for the treasury secretary position include billionaire investor Scott Bessent and Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick, both of whom have articulated differing views on tariffs. Bessent has described tariffs as a negotiating tool, while Lutnick has been more supportive of broad tariff applications. Lutnick, who co-chairs Trump’s transition team, is actively involved in proposing candidates for key roles, including the Treasury Department.
Trump has previously framed tariffs as a dual-purpose tool: a means to negotiate better trade terms and a source of revenue to fund tax cuts. His campaign proposed universal tariffs as high as 20% and even steeper taxes on Chinese imports, yet details on implementation and objectives have remained vague. This ambiguity raises questions about whether tariffs will primarily serve as a revenue source or as leverage in trade negotiations.
The implications of this choice are significant. Higher tariffs could exacerbate inflation and disrupt the stock market gains that have been a point of pride for Trump since his election. For instance, economists have estimated that a 60% tariff on Chinese goods, combined with a 20% universal tariff, could cost the average U.S. household approximately $2,600 annually.
Bessent has suggested that tariffs should be viewed as a “one-time price adjustment” and not inherently inflationary, focusing primarily on China. In contrast, Lutnick has emphasized the protective role tariffs can play for American workers, calling them an essential tool for the president.
Elon Musk has publicly endorsed Lutnick, arguing that Bessent represents a “business-as-usual” choice while Lutnick would bring about meaningful change. This endorsement underscores the high stakes of the treasury secretary selection, as it could influence the economic direction of the incoming administration.
Despite the potential benefits touted by Trump regarding job creation and economic growth, higher tariffs carry risks. They could provoke trade wars, alienate investors, and lead to higher prices for consumers on everyday goods. Corporate leaders are closely monitoring the situation, preparing for a variety of scenarios as uncertainty looms over tariff policies.
Major companies have expressed concern over the potential impact of tariffs, with some planning for higher costs and adjusting their supply chains accordingly. For example, Stanley Black & Decker’s CEO highlighted the challenges of moving manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. due to cost considerations. Meanwhile, Columbia Sportswear’s CEO voiced skepticism about tariffs improving domestic production, despite minimal exposure to Chinese imports.
As Trump continues to evaluate candidates for treasury secretary, the ultimate decision will not only shape his economic policies but also signal how aggressively he plans to pursue tariffs as part of his broader trade agenda. The transition team has indicated that personnel decisions will be announced as they are made, leaving businesses and investors to navigate the uncertainties of the upcoming administration.
Related Topics:
