Following the recent antitrust ruling that found Google in violation of antitrust laws, the Justice Department is now deliberating on a range of potential remedies to address the tech giant’s alleged monopolistic practices. Reports from Bloomberg and the New York Times indicate that DOJ attorneys are considering various options to present to US District of Columbia District Court Judge Amit Mehta in the coming weeks.
The proposed remedies, which could be submitted by September 4, include measures as drastic as breaking up Google’s operations or mandating the sharing of its search engine data with competitors. Another suggested action is to terminate agreements that currently secure Google’s search engine as the default option on mobile devices and internet browsers.
Antitrust attorney Carl Hittinger noted that formulating injunctive relief might prove more intricate than establishing liability in this case. The potential remedies put forward by prosecutors have the capacity to significantly reshape the landscape of the online search market, although their actual impact remains uncertain and subject to future developments.
Google has expressed its intention to appeal the ruling, with its legal team possibly seeking a delay in implementing any behavioral changes while the case undergoes review in the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.
The possibility of a breakup of Google’s empire, involving divestitures of key assets such as its Android operating system, Chrome browser, or AdWords platform, has been discussed among legal experts. Despite differing opinions on the likelihood of such an outcome, the focus remains on determining a remedy that serves the public interest most effectively.
In addition to structural changes, another potential remedy could involve requiring Google to share more search data with competitors and offering choice screens to users of mobile devices and browsers to select their preferred search engine.
The termination of revenue-sharing agreements that cement Google’s search engine as the default on various platforms could have substantial consequences for both Google and its partners, notably Apple, which reportedly earns billions annually from such agreements.
While the repercussions of any imposed remedies on Google’s operations remain to be seen, analysts suggest that the company’s primary threats may emerge from emerging AI-assisted search engines and the competitive landscape in online advertising, particularly with rival companies like Meta making strides in attracting advertisers.
As discussions continue regarding the appropriate actions to be taken in response to the antitrust ruling against Google, the tech industry and the online search market are poised for potential significant shifts.
