Access to finance is a critical driver of business growth, yet women-led enterprises often encounter systemic barriers in securing funding. Despite being equally likely to apply for and receive credit as firms managed by men, women-led businesses tend to secure significantly lower loan amounts. This discrepancy, according to a comprehensive analysis of World Bank Enterprise Survey data from 61 countries, is not attributable to differences in risk profiles, profitability, or productivity. Instead, it suggests a persistent gender-driven capital misallocation, particularly in societies with stringent social norms.
Examining Gender Disparities in Business Financing
Women entrepreneurs face both demand-side and supply-side challenges when seeking credit. Cultural and societal norms can deter female entrepreneurs from applying for loans, while implicit biases among financial institutions may result in less favorable lending decisions. Additional constraints, such as regulatory limitations and gender-based violence, further hinder access to financial resources.
Utilizing micro-data from the World Bank Enterprise Surveys spanning 2008 to 2023, researchers classified countries as either ‘traditional’ or ‘less traditional’ based on social attitudes toward gender roles, as measured by the World Values Survey. The findings reveal that in nations where conservative norms prevail, women-led firms are more severely affected by financial constraints.
Equal Credit Access but Unequal Loan Amounts
Data indicate that women-managed firms are as likely as their male-led counterparts to apply for credit and are even 5 percentage points less likely to face rejection. In more traditional countries, this rejection rate drops further by 12 percentage points. While this might initially seem counterintuitive, it aligns with research suggesting that only the most capable women navigate the barriers to entrepreneurship in these environments.
However, the disparity emerges when examining the loan amounts received. Women-led firms secure, on average, 39% less financing than those managed by men. The gap is even wider in traditional societies, reaching 54%, while in less traditional settings, the shortfall stands at 32%. This suggests that explicit and implicit biases in financial decision-making may limit credit availability for women entrepreneurs, even when they demonstrate strong business performance.
A Case of Misallocated Capital
The lower financing levels for women-led businesses cannot be justified by weaker financial performance. On the contrary, these firms tend to be more profitable than those run by men. This profitability advantage may explain their slightly lower loan rejection rates. However, they also experience lower sales per worker, suggesting challenges in accessing broader labor and product markets.
The underfunding of women-led firms contributes to inefficient capital allocation. Analyzing return on capital, a key measure of capital efficiency, researchers found that women-managed businesses report a 14.7% higher return on capital than male-managed firms—an indication of misallocated resources. The disparity is even more pronounced in traditional societies, where women-led businesses see a 29.6% higher return on capital, reinforcing the notion that these firms could significantly benefit from greater financial support.
Addressing Gender Bias in Financial Systems
The implications of this capital misallocation extend beyond individual businesses. When profitable firms—especially those led by women—operate under credit constraints, overall economic productivity suffers. Policies aimed at reducing gender disparities in business financing could enhance efficiency and economic growth.
Proposed interventions include blended finance mechanisms to reduce gender-based lending disparities, gender-inclusive financial products, expanded market access for female entrepreneurs, and regulatory reforms ensuring fair lending practices. By fostering a more inclusive financial landscape, policymakers can help unlock the full potential of women-led enterprises, ensuring more equitable capital allocation and improved economic outcomes.
Related Topics:
Persistent Gender Pay Gap Remains in Financial and Insurance Sectors
Pepper Money Maintains Strong Mortgage Originations Amid Economic Headwinds
ProSpend Launches Campaign to Revolutionize Australian Finance Processes
